Supervisors expected to pass Parrot protection 
                law
                
                Photo courtesy TakmonaGardner.com 
               By Tamara Barak, Bay City News Service 
                
                March 13, 2007
               SAN FRANCISCO (BCN) - The San Francisco Board of Supervisors 
                today is expected to pass legislation protecting the habitat of 
                the famed parrots of Telegraph Hill. 
              The legislation, proposed by Supervisor Bevan Dufty, was passed 
                9-1 on its first reading last week, said Boe Hayward, a legislative 
                aide to Dufty. 
              The birds, longtime local celebrities, gained international fame 
                in Judy Irving's 2003 documentary "The Wild Parrots of Telegraph 
                Hill." The film chronicles the flock's friendship with formerly 
                homeless musician Mark Bittner. 
              But in October 2005, the owner of a property adjacent to Bittner's 
                North Beach cottage cut down three of five Monterey cypress trees 
                that provide the birds a perch from which to watch for predators. 
                Bittner managed to save the remaining two trees by standing between 
                the trees and the chainsaws, and negotiations began for the protection 
                of the habitat. 
              Dufty's proposed law would provide for the pruning and maintenance 
                of the two surviving cypress trees, mandate the planting of up 
                to six new parrot-friendly trees and protect the landowner from 
                legal liability if dying trees fall before they can be replaced. 
              The Northeast San Francisco Conservancy has raised about $5,000 
                from donations to pay an arborist to prune and preserve the trees 
                until new ones can be planted. 
              "We got 1,600 e-mails from around the world and all over 
                the country. The interest in these parrots is ultimately worldwide," 
                Hayward said. Dufty's office has not received a single e mail 
                opposed to the legislation, Hayward said. 
              Ed Jew was the sole supervisor who voted against the legislation 
                at its first reading. Jew said today that he's an animal lover, 
                but the city is setting a dangerous precedent in offering to maintain 
                private property. 
              "My issue is if we're going to take care of these trees, 
                there are going to be other individuals in other districts who 
                want the same thing and I don't know how we're going to provide 
                funding for that," he said. 
              While supporters of the legislation promise its cost to the city 
                will be minimal, Jew said he hasn't seen any evidence to support 
                that will be true over the long term. 
              "We have to be really fiscally minded," he said. 
              The parrots' supporters, including the animal welfare organization 
                In Defense of Animals, presented Land Use Committee members with 
                a petition of support bearing more than 4,400 signatures at their 
                March 5 meeting.  
              Committee members unanimously supported the legislation and passed 
                it on the Board of Supervisors. 
              "The parrots are a great part of the identity of our city. 
                They're the poster children of urban wildlife," In Defense 
                of Animals spokesman Mat Thomas said at the time. 
              "We're in support of Bevan Dufty's legislation so that parrots 
                can have their habitat in the area and hopefully maintain their 
                relationship with Mark Bittner." 
              Copyright © 2007 by Bay City News, Inc. -- Republication, 
                Rebroadcast or any other Reuse without the express written consent 
                of Bay City News, Inc. is prohibited. 
              #### 
               
                
                
               
              
              
             |