Better Late Than Never:
              Matier & Ross get the story on this year's 
                budget... 
                six months late
                
                District 6 Supervisor Chris Daly 
                Photo(s) by Luke 
                Thomas 
              By Chris 
                Daly, special to Fog City Journal 
              Reprinted with permission 
              December 4, 2007
              In our first months in office in 2001, Matt Gonzalez announced 
                his proposal 
                to take over the Housing Authority. The proposal certainly 
                had merit - a HUD audit found serious mismanagement and federal 
                indictments rained on the agency's Section 8 program. But I expressed 
                concern to Matt about the political repercussions. Certainly Willie 
                Brown's political machine would counter with strong 
                resistance and even accusations 
                of racism, and besides, we didn't seem to have the votes. 
              Matt answered me, "Even if we don't win, time 
                will 
                prove 
                us 
                right," 
                and forged 
                ahead with my support. The principled but impolitic stance 
                did not win enough votes on the Board of Supervisors, but it did 
                provide a pillar for Matt's energetic, populist campaign for Mayor 
                2 years later. 
              June was a rough month. 
                Standing alone at the Board of Supervisors, I challenged Gavin 
                Newsom, his "white 
                bread budget," and his $80 
                million giveaway to the Police Officers Association. Newsom 
                cut my supplemental appropriation for affordable housing and programmed 
                the monies into more police and pet projects. 
              In a speech 
                at the June 19th Board meeting (that didn't get the same attention 
                that a speech 
                a couple of hours later did), I took issue with both Newsom's 
                priorities and timing 
                of making huge giveaways to campaign supporters during an election 
                year. Newsom was blowing through enormous amounts of public money 
                and, at the same time, racking up big endorsements for his reelection. 
                However, in the newspaper editorials, it was only "Daly's 
                Political Games" taken to task, and at the Board of Supervisors, 
                I was removed 
                from the Chair of the Budget Committee. Nothing of Newsom's maneuvering. 
                
                Mayor Gavin Newsom 
              Queue ahead six months. Matier & Ross finally 
                get the budget story. 
              A cursory review of the Controller's 
                budget math shows Newsom blew through over $150 million of 
                our money in only 8 months - with the largest chunk, $30 million, 
                going to the all-powerful Police Officers Association and another 
                $13 million to symbolically important firefighters. Not that the 
                contract giveaways were just for tit-for-tat support of the Mayor's 
                reelection. 
              They're really gifts that keep on giving. 
              This year the San Francisco Firefighters PAC ponied up the first 
                $5000 for Gavin's "Let's 
                Really Work Together Committee". The POA followed with 
                a $5000 
                check of their own. Firefighter President John Hanley told 
                me that that was just the "cost of doing business." 
                And to think that I thought that heroes weren't supposed to put 
                themselves before others! 
              While it's clear that the Mayor's Office and the corporate press 
                buried the story of Gavin's drunken spending until after Elections 
                counted all the ballots, the Mayor's Budget Office released their 
                budget 
                instructions weeks earlier than normal this year. This may 
                be a part of their attempt to block placement of the Affordable 
                Housing Charter 
                Amendment on next November's ballot. 
              They've painstakingly placed language of the increased burden 
                of "$72 million in voter mandates" in every 
                article 
                and 
                editorial 
                on the subject - despite the fact that most of any increase in 
                mandates comes just as a percentage of increased revenues to the 
                City.  
              When asked where the Mayor's Office came up with $72 million 
                anyway, Todd Rydstrom, Director of Budget & Analysis for the 
                Controller, could only speculate that they added voter 
                mandates and baseline growth line items which would produce 
                a figure of only $65 million. Regardless, once again the Mayor 
                is using the budget to run his political game. 
              This time I hope that the rest of us are a bit more on top of 
                it. 
              
              
              
              
              Permalink 
              #### 
              
              
              
             |