Home   Google ARCHIVE SEARCH: Date:

Pelosi: 'Federal Marriage Amendment Defiles Our Cherished Constitution'

From the Office of Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi

July 18, 2006

Washington, D.C. - House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi spoke on the House floor this morning against a constitutional amendment to prohibit same sex marriage, the amendment was defeated:

"Mr. Speaker, I thank Mr. Nadler for yielding and for his great leadership in defending the Constitution of the United States. I also want to thank Mr. Conyers for his leadership on the issue, and say to Congresswoman Baldwin and Congressman Frank, what an honor it is to serve with you in the Congress. It is a privilege to call you colleagues.

"Mr. Speaker, the crisis in the Middle East reminds us that it is our responsibility as a Congress to address the urgent priorities of the American people. Yet today, it is painfully obvious that instead of tackling the challenges facing our nation and our world, Republicans want to persist in their agenda to distract and divide.

"That is why the American people are demanding a New Direction. That is why they say in great numbers that our country is going in the wrong direction. The challenges that our country face are too great for Republican politics as usual. The Constitutional amendment that we are debating today has been brought to this floor with the full knowledge that it has no prospects for success, either now or in the foreseeable future. This is a partisan exercise by Republicans to divide the American people, rather than forge consensus to solve our urgent problems.

"Our Constitution, which we all take an oath to support and defend, is an enduring and living document that has throughout our history expanded rights, not diminished them. Though the federal marriage amendment claims to protect marriage, it benefits no one and actually limits the rights of millions of Americans.

"In September, I am happy to say, my husband and I will celebrate our 43rd wedding anniversary. I am a mother of five. We have five children and five grandchildren. We are expecting our sixth grandchild in October. And we certainly appreciate the value of family. We see family in our community as a source of strength, and a source of comfort to people. What constitutes that family is an individual and personal decision, but for all, it is a place where people find love, comfort, and support.

"As we consider this amendment, we must understand we are talking about our fellow citizens-people under the law-who are lesbian and gay, and what it means to them. They are members of our communities with dreams and aspirations, including their right to find comfort, love, and support on equal terms. They have every right-and every expectation as any American-that they are entitled to the very purpose for which this nation was founded: that we are all created equal by our Creator and endowed with inalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

"Let me tell you about two extraordinary constituents of mine. I have talked about them on the floor before-Phyllis Lyon and Del Martin-both in their 80s, who have lived together for more than 50 years. They're grandparents by the way-they're grandmothers. Their commitment, their love, and their happiness are a source of strength to all who know them. They are leaders in our community and are held in high esteem by all who know them. Why should they not have the full protection of the law? To be able to share each other's health and bereavement benefits? To be able to share all the protections and rights accruing to financial relationships, inheritance, and immigration? Why should Phyllis and Del and millions of gay and lesbian citizens not be treated equally and not be afforded the legal protections conferred by marriage?

"I will again vote against this amendment, as I have in the past, because it is counter to the noble ideals of liberty, freedom, and equality for which this nation stands. This amendment defiles our cherished Constitution by saying that some members of our society are not equal under the law. This is blatant discrimination. It is wrong. It does not belong in our Constitution. It is contrary, again, to the noble purposes for which this nation was founded, and it is contrary to the principle of ending discrimination, unifying our country, and fostering equality for all.

"The American people demand that this Congress address their priorities: the creation of jobs, a minimum wage that has not been raised in nine years, gas prices that are more than $3 a gallon, and the skyrocketing costs of higher education. That's what they want us to be doing here.

"Mr. Speaker, let us strive to do the work of the American people. Let us strive to unite our country and to take our country to a whole New Direction. Let us honor our Constitution, let us honor all of God's children, and let us reject this amendment."

####

EMAIL THIS STORY |PRINT THIS STORY

Sponsors


The Hunger Site

Cooking Classes
in Buenos Aires

Buenos Aires B&B

Calitri in southern Italy

L' Aquila in Abruzzo

Health Insurance Quotes

Blogroll:

Bruce Brugmann's
Blog

Calitics

Civic Center
Blogspot

Dan Noyes
I-Team

Greg Dewar

Griper Blade

LeftinSF

Malik Looper

KPFA

KPOO

KQED

KTEH

MetroBloggingSF

MetroWize Urban Guide

Michael Moore

N Judah Chronicles

PelosiWatch

Robert Solis
Blogspot

SF Bay Guardian
Politics

SFBulldog

SFLuxe

SFPartyParty

SFWeekly

SFWillie's Blog

SF/Unscripted

StarkedSF

Sweet Melissa

TheDalyBlog