By Luke Thomas
April 5, 2010
An election reform measure being proposed for the November ballot in San Francisco would add the Saturday before the traditional Tuesday election day as an alternate day for voters to cast their ballots.
If passed, San Francisco would become the first city in the US to hold a privately-funded election on a weekend.
The purpose of the WhyTuesdaySF initiative is to increase voter turnout and election participation, proponents of the measure say. Its detractors fear the private funds raised could be misused to target a specific class of voters in the 2011 mayoral election when the pilot Saturday election would first be tested.
In the previous ten elections San Francisco has averaged between 42 and 47 percent turnout, Ground Floor Public Affairs political consultant Alex Tourk stated during a signature gathering kickoff campaign event held Saturday at Ella Hill Hutch Community Center. “It’s shameful,” he said, adding that the US ranks 132 out of 179 developed nations in eligible voter turnout.
Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi, who is sponsoring another election reform measure on the November ballot that will allow same-day voter registration, said he supports efforts to increase voter participation but expressed concerns with the funding of the WhyTuesdaySF initiative.
“I’m open minded, but I’ll tell you the reservation is on the private funding side,” Mirkarimi said. “This enters into a new domain that raises questions beyond the pilot: How would we be able to fund the expansion of a beyond Tuesday system?”
“There are no rules,” Mirkarimi added, referring to how private funds needed to pay for an additional election day could be spent. “So the rules would have to be designed in order to accommodate this new construct.”
Mirkarimi, who recently changed party registration from Green Party to Democrat, called Saturday voting a good idea in principle. “It needs to resonate throughout every corridor in the United States,” he said. “If there’s some way that we can reform the mandatory Tuesday voting requirement and expand it, all the better.”
Adding to the concerns raised by privately-funded elections, SF Green Party organizer Eric Brooks referred to the impact of private funding on public broadcasting as an example of how a public institution can be compromised.
“Public broadcasting has been heavily undermined in the U.S. by allowing in private and corporate donors; donors which now heavily dumb down and manipulate PBS and NPR broadcasts with their financial influence,” Brooks said.
“If we allow private donors to similarly fund elections, our very democratic process will be subject to similar manipulation,” Brooks added. “This is an obvious maneuver to, at the very least, somehow use this private funding – probably through strategic advertising – to only turn out people to Saturday polls who will vote for the Downtown machine Democrat; and at worst, it is literally the first attack of a campaign to privatize our very elections themselves.”
Responding to the question of whether private funding for the 2011 pilot Saturday election could be used for targeted electioneering purposes, Tourk said: “It’s in the language of the initiative that the money has to be used for the Saturday operation and, by the way, the controller will tell us how much it will cost,” adding that the City Controller will be the holder of the funds, that all funding sources will be made available via a website for public scrutiny.
Tourk assured Fog City Journal the WhyTuesdaySF measure is non-partisan as evidenced by a broad coalition of supporters from all sides of the political aisle, including San Francisco Republican Chair Howard Epstein who attended the signature gathering rally.
If the initiative fails to qualify for lack of funding to pay for the pilot Saturday election, any funds raised will be held by the City for use in voter registration and education, Tourk said.
April 6, 2010 at 3:45 pm
No matter how tightly we regulate the spending of such private funds, no regulation of any kind can protect us against a scenario in which, after several election cycles of our getting hooked on private donors funding our elections; the private donors suddenly pull the funding during a key future election in which their interests are not served by a high voter turnout.
Truly the best way to ensure the integrity of our elections is a full transition to having them solely funded by the public, with no private money anywhere near the process.
This private funded path is an extremely dangerous one that would take us in exactly the opposite direction.
Eric Brooks
April 6, 2010 at 9:21 am
Insane,
The last time we had special polls opened like this was for the Niners election 10 or 15 years ago. Only in Hunters Point and when the boss of one of the precincts yelled ‘fraud’ and was scheduled to testify she and her grandchildren were burned to death. Willie Brown showed up at the scene of the fire and declared it a tragic accident even before an investigation.
Sure, you can trust these guys.
h.
April 5, 2010 at 10:40 pm
I’m all down with Saturday voting, but elections need to remain entirely within the public domain.
Many Greens believe that there are few elected partisan Greens because election laws disadvantage small parties. That is partially so, but the main reason why we have so few partisan electeds is because the people who run are generally not viewed as worthy of being given the keys to the government.
Saturday voting is not going to increase turnout when no matter how we vote, no matter what candidates promise, average folks lose almost all of the time to wealthy interests, the likes of which can pay for Saturday voting.
I think that Alex would agree that he’s shown some questionable judgment in the selection of political associates in the past. I’d not trust Alex’ judgment on this one either.
These interests rigged the absentee ballot game in 2003 in association with the City Attorney’s office, the Department of Elections and the Newsom campaign by abandoning the published schedule and tipping off Newsom that the absentee ballots were being mailed out several days early. This is gold because Newsom had literature timed to arrive on the same day that the ballots arrived in the mail.
To the extent that no matter who gets elected, democracy is prohibited from materially changing the balance of power in San Francisco away from rapacious corruption, it really doesn’t matter whether we vote private or public, Tuesdays or Saturdays, with hanging chads or thumbprints, we lose.
-marc
April 5, 2010 at 9:03 pm
Voter apathy is an embarrassment to America. However, privately-funded Voting? That is an even bigger embarrassment. Ross – your first idea as a democrat is to sell an election? Boy, progressives are making their mark on the Democratic party in SF.