A coalition of union leaders, former and current supervisors and activists held an anti-Twitter tax exemption strategy meeting last eve at Buck Tavern. Photo by Luke Thomas.
By Luke Thomas
March 10, 2011
Former District 6 Supervisor Chris Daly’s Buck Tavern bar and grill – soon to be renamed Daly’s Dive – serves up more than a broad range of beers and tasty, hot pub grub, doubling last eve as a makeshift battleground headquarters for a grassroots campaign opposing controversial legislation that aims to gift Twitter, Inc. a payroll tax exemption, to dissuade the social media company from relocating to Brisbane.
The off-the-record confab which barred media coverage, was attended by several well-known figures in San Francisco politics including Supervisor John Avalos, SEIU organizer Gabriel Haaland, attorney David Waggoner, a political consultant, several political activists and Daly.
There are several reasons why the Twitter legislation should be canned, opponents say, not least of which is the city’s $380 million budget deficit. Such an exemption, if passed by the Board of Supervisors, would relieve Twitter of paying payroll taxes on new employees for six years if the company remains in San Francisco. Moreover, should Twitter go public, the company is expected to be valued at $10 billion and would likely rake in tens of millions of dollars in annual advertising revenue from its popular messaging service.
Proponents of the legislation, co-sponsored by Board of Supervisors President David Chiu and District 6 Supervisor Jane Kim, argue the corporate welfare perk is intended to spur job creation in a depressed economy as well as to address blight at Market and 9th streets where Twitter plan to move their offices if the deal goes through. Mid-Market blight was previously defined as occurring between 5th and 7th streets.
But, as has been reported in The Bay Citizen, there’s more to this Twitter deal than meets the eye:
“Alvin Dworman, the owner of a Market Street building proposed as the new headquarters for Twitter, gave sharply discounted office space in the same building to former Mayor Gavin Newsom’s campaign for lieutenant governor — a political contribution valued at more than $11,000, campaign finance records show.
“Weeks after the gift last fall, Newsom officials aided negotiations between Twitter and Dworman by offering the Internet company a payroll tax freeze as an incentive to move into Dworman’s building, a 1 million-square-foot art deco structure at 1355 Market St. once known as the San Francisco Mart.”
Adding more fuel to the fire surrounding the deal, Twitter posted a blog post, March 10, 2009, assuring then Mayor Gavin Newsom Twitter would remain in San Francisco:
“San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom visited our office this morning to have a tour and then talk with us a bit about how Twitter and the city could work together better. It was a great discussion and afterward we assured Mayor Newsom that as Twitter grows we’ll continue to keep our headquarters here in San Francisco.”
Luke Thomas
Luke Thomas is a former software developer and computer consultant who proudly hails from London, England. In 2001, Thomas took a yearlong sabbatical to travel and develop a photographic portfolio. Upon his return to the US, Thomas studied photojournalism to pursue a career in journalism. In 2004, Thomas worked for several neighborhood newspapers in San Francisco before accepting a partnership agreement with the SanFranciscoSentinel.com, a news website formerly covering local, state and national politics. In September 2006, Thomas launched FogCityJournal.com. The BBC, CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, Fox News, New York Times, Der Spiegel, San Francisco Chronicle, San Francisco Magazine, 7x7, San Francisco Examiner, San Francisco Bay Guardian and the San Francisco Weekly, among other publications and news outlets, have published his work. Thomas is a member of the Freelance Unit of the Pacific Media Workers Guild, TNG-CWA Local 39521 and is a member of the Society of Professional Journalists.
Follow Me:
The Hunger Site
March 13, 2011 at 12:54 pm
on a related note, there’s always this:
http://pol.moveon.org/event/events/attendees/index.html?event_id=113305&id=-9157156-wVV5tkx
(just making sure everyone got the memo)…
March 11, 2011 at 10:05 am
“Strategery?”
I count 18 people and 5 drinks visible. Use your head kid. Make every gathering of politicos (except my salon – noon to 3pm every Friday) a 3 drink minimum.
Daly for Mayor!
Go Giants!
h.
March 11, 2011 at 1:16 am
@h – secret meeting with over 200 invites on Facebook????
I know that you have trouble with the finer points of strategy sometimes, but on occasion, it’s better not to publish every little detail of your strategy. Does Timmy tell the batter when he’s going to throw a change-up?
March 10, 2011 at 8:39 pm
John Avalos and Chris Daly can kick the press out and no problem, but Jane Kim does it and it must be a conspiracy.
March 10, 2011 at 7:01 pm
Amazing,
Only SF Progressives would hold a ‘secret’ meeting in an open bar. It brings to mind the time the SF Young Democrats had a meeting at Temple Bar during a Trivia Night. Our team included Hennessey and Herrera and Peskin and we all got drunker than skunks and got our asses kicked. The SFYD? They asked us to keep it down because they were trying to have a private political meeting.
wadda town, wadda town,
Giants won 7-0!
h.
March 10, 2011 at 5:54 pm
Hope, just to be clear, I respected the media no-fly-zone but couldn’t resist taking a picture. The attendees were pretty mum about the meeting agenda and who knows that they discussed.
No amount of whiskey or beer-boarding would loosen their tongues.
🙂
March 10, 2011 at 3:49 pm
Many of the very people pictured in this article love to apply to San Francisco progressives the phrase yanking defeat from the jaws of victory. I hope more reasons than those described in this article have been discussed or they will all be singing that phrase once again.
While the reasons above might suggest “insider trading” in the Twitter deal, they come across as petty high-school hatred of Gavin Newsom and you can bet your ass Chiu and Kim will exploit that whining so typical of these particular progressives.
There are many valid reasons to add that demonstrate flaws in the legislation and its reasoning instead of the standard and unsuccessful technique of only trying to make Newsom look bad, not the least of which is a lack of evidence supporting the idea of job creation through payroll tax breaks, debate over the biotech tax break results, and hard numbers on the ridiculous amount of money available to Twitter for jobs.