Candidate for the 8th congressional district, Cindy Sheehan.
Photo by Luke Thomas
October 28, 2008
The title for this piece was a very unfortunate statement Nancy Pelosi made after she handed the banksters on Wall Street 700 billion dollars of our money. This was a whopper of a crime that bailed out fabulously wealthy people who took risks that made them rich on the way up, and now again on their way down. I don’t know about you all, but I could have a heckuva party with 700 billion dollars!
One of the corporations that has now received around 100 billion dollars in federal bailout funds is AIG. This firm has continued to party all over the country, treating its associates to fabulous retreats at taxpayer’s expense. Not only is AIG still partying hardy, but according to Pelosi’s recent financial statement, she owns between 250-500 thousand dollars in AIG stock.
Can we all say, conflict of interest?
I think it’s about time that the establishment media here in San Francisco quit giving Ms. Pelosi a free pass on her unethical and non-progressive values and actions and start asking her some relevant questions. I think the new paradigm can begin this week when Nancy is on The Forum with Michael Krasny on KQED. We brainstormed a few questions that Michael could ask Pelosi…well more than a few!
• Why do you say that you are against the occupation of Iraq when you have given George Bush billions of dollars of “blank checks” to wage it?
• Why did you vote to give Bush the authorization to attack Afghanistan, when Afghanistan never attacked the US? Why did you vote for the freedom and Orwellian named stealing USA PATRIOT Act?
• What did you know about the administration’s inhumane and grisly policy of torture and when did you know it? Why did you allow it to continue?
• Why do you support the No Child Left Behind Act that is effectively destroying our education system and allows for the active recruitment of our young people by military recruiters?
• Why did you give telecoms and BushCo immunity from warrantless wiretapping? Why did you destroy our 4th amendment by the FISA Modernization Act?
• Why did you give the banksters on Wall Street 700 billion dollars when people are starving and sleeping on our streets?
• What is your plan to pump liquidity into the people’s economy to allow prosperity to gurgle up and no longer trickle up?
• Why did you take impeachment off the table when the Bush Administration have clearly committed high crimes and misdemeanors and why did you say on The View that you didn’t know of any crimes Bush had committed after Congressman Dennis Kucinich charged him with 35 impeachable offenses? What are and what will the implications be for allowing BushCo to slink off unpunished?
• Why did you cave into the Republicans and allow the ban on offshore drilling to expire?
• Why do employees in your companies not belong to labor unions? Why do you support free trade agreements that oppress workers and destroy the environment?
• Why are you claiming in campaign literature that you obtained federal funds to clean up the Hunter’s Point Naval station to help the community of Bay View, when the funds were to be used to decontaminate the area where you hope the new stadium for the 49ers will be placed?
• Why did your Congress not work to protect our elections from fraud and tampering of voting machines that can be easily compromised?
• Why haven’t you held a town hall meeting in the district since 2006 but you have the time to sell books and fund raise all over the country?
• Why won’t you debate your Congressional opponents? What are you afraid of?
I would love to tell Nancy Pelosi that her party is over, but I highly doubt that the establishment media here in San Francisco will suddenly grow some journalistic integrity and actually hold her feet to the fire where they belong.
I would also love to tell her this to her face, but like her best buddy, George Bush, she won’t face me and answer questions about issues that truly affect us all.
Editor’s Note: In the following video Pelosi comments on the AIG bailout: “All of the gain is privatized and all the risk is nationalized.”
October 28, 2008 at 3:36 pm
One reason Sean Elsbernd might not want testify under oath could be because there are two active ethics complaints filed against him (Complaint No. 21-080806 and Complaint No. 22-0808815) and he might have had to answer questions regarding these complaints.
The first complaint is he not declaring a conflict of interest when voting on his wife’s salary and her department’s budget. The second complaint is regarding hisspending $608.75 of his campaign money on his hotel bill at the Imperial Hotel in Cork Ireland Sept. 19, 2005 and $744.88 on his hotel bill at the Georgian Hotel Sept. 23, 2005.