District 3 candidate Joe Nation
Photo by Luke Thomas
By Luke Thomas
May 11, 2008
Senate District 3 candidate Joe Nation has not taken an official position on all eight San Francisco propositions on the June ballot, Fog City Journal has learned.
The former assemblymember from San Rafael, considered a frontrunner in a fiercely contested battle with co-frontrunner Assemblymember Mark Leno and incumbent Senator Carole Migden, is raising questions about his ability to effectively represent San Francisco residents.
District 3 encompasses the eastern half of San Francisco and includes Marin County and portions of Sonoma County. Forty-five percent of the District’s electorate resides in San Francisco.
Responding to Fog City Journal inquiry about his position on two controversial ballot measures – Propositions F and G – Nation wrote:
“I have not taken a position on the San Francisco ballot measures. I am very supportive of increased economic development in the Bayview Hunters Point area, but I have not studied this issue sufficiently to where I would be willing to take a public position.”
At issue for San Franciscans is the development of much needed affordable housing on the decades-neglected Bayview Hunters Point Shipyard site. Proposition G, a measure backed by Florida-based Lennar, Inc., pledges to make up to 25 percent of the estimated 8,500 to 10,000 homes Lennar plans to develop, affordable.
Proposition F takes a stronger position and would mandate at least 50 percent of all housing developed on the site to be affordable. It has the backing of grassroots community activists and organizations that gathered over 11,800 signatures to place Proposition F on the ballot.
Proponents of Proposition F say Lennar’s plan “did not go though the usual planning process but was created in back room political deals,” according to a Proposition G rebuttal argument in the June 3 Voter Information Guide.
Lennar, through its spokesperson Kofi Bonner, has called Proposition F a “poison pill” that would, if passed, kill the Lennar project.
Proposition F has the political backing of Supervisor Chris Daly and the backing of Coleman Advocates for Children and Youth, St. Peter’s Housing Committee, POWER, Environmental Justice Agency, Chinese Progressive Association, and the Sierra Club. Proposition G has the political backing of Mayor Gavin Newsom, District Supervisor Sophie Maxwell and Senator Dianne Feinstein. (See “Pay to Play Bay Area” for a primer on Lennar’s connections to San Francisco’s political establishment).
Leno has endorsed Proposition G and has publicly stated his opposition to Proposition F. Conversely, Migden has endorsed Proposition F and opposes Proposition G.
Fog City Journal asked Nation Friday if he is prepared to take the time necessary to study the San Francisco propositions, with a view to him publicly stating his positions ahead of the June 3 election.
As of time of publishing, Nation remains silent.
For many voters who are not familiar with Nation or his candidacy, knowing that he has not taken a stand on the most important housing issue facing San Franciscans, will likely raise red flags about his competency to effectively represent San Francisco.
Or worse, San Francisco voters may correctly interpret Nation’s reluctance to take a stand, on any of the local propositions, as political sidestepping.
May 11, 2008 at 8:29 pm
Interesting he hasn’t taken a position. Nation met with community leaders behind Proposition F in mid-March after being stumped by a related question at the UC Hastings debate.
Stumped like a fox.
May 11, 2008 at 6:27 pm
Hell, even I have a position on F and G. It’s not like you have to be a genius.